What dependable data quality requires

My approach connects structural validation with semantic checks, reconciliation across independent sources, anomaly detection, lineage, observability, and evidence that can explain why a result should be trusted.

Structural and semantic corruption

Structural failures are visible when fields, types, or required records are missing. Semantic corruption is harder: the record is technically valid, yet its meaning has drifted, its source is stale, or it conflicts with another valid system.

Engineering practices

  • Validate meaning as well as format.
  • Reconcile independent evidence instead of assuming a single source is authoritative.
  • Make data-quality decisions observable and explainable.
  • Design recovery paths, not only alerts.
  • Measure the quality of the evidence used during incident response.

Related work: public research, engineering case studies, and technical ideas.